Home › Island News › Local News
Marco landlords may be held responsible for tenant nuisances
Short term rental draft ordinance complete
STORY TOOLS
RELATED STORIES
- Marco rental committee will have another ‘final’ meeting
- Marco rental committee may do about-face on registration
- Rental committee sets occupancy, length terms for rentals
- Committee to recommend registration for rentals
- Committee gets feel for rental property dilemma
More Local News
- Memories saved, memories made
- Curatolo proposes adding two members to the School Board
- Marco man appointed by Gov. Crist to Florida Elections Commission
Share and Enjoy [?]
Residents living next door to short term rental properties may find some relief to their troubles – eventually. The rental housing advisory committee completed a draft ordinance that will require short-term rental homes to be registered with the city of Marco Island.
Marco officials will also hold property owners responsible if they do not quickly respond to nuisance violations caused by their tenants.
The draft ordinance is expected to be reviewed by the Marco Island City Council this summer and then go to the city’s planning board before once again returning to council.
“I just wanted to ensure the council would want this and wouldn’t just toss it out before anyone spent anymore time on it,” said the non-voting committee chair Charles Kiester.
If council votes to adopt a short-term rental housing ordinance similar to the one proposed by the rental housing advisory committee, a draft will then go on to the planning division for further adjustments before a final review by the city attorney and council.
Although this draft is far from final, the committee proposed the following: First, short term rental property owners must pay an annual fee to register with the city and provide a copy of their Florida Resort Dwelling License. This state license is required for all properties rented for less than 30 days and at least three times in a calendar year. The state license also requires a fire inspection.
The city defined a short-term rental property as any single family detached dwelling which rents for periods less than six months. A dwelling under this new ordinance my not be rented more than one time within any seven day period.
Failure to register a short-term rental property will constitute the property being labeled a “chronic nuisance” and will come with a $1,000 to $5,000 fine. The committee decided to charge for registration after some debate.
“I suggest we don’t charge for the initial registration. It will allow us some time to consider what this will cost the city and encourage folks to come forward and register,” Kiester said.
Other committee members disagreed. “I don’t think that makes sense at all,” Dameron responded. “Even a nominal fee by 1,000 rentals will help offset the costs the city will incur. Remember, (rentals) are still getting $1,000; $2,000; $3,000 each week,” he continued.
Joe Oliverio agreed with Dameron. “If they want to be in the rental business they can pay their fees just like I pay my fees to be in the restaurant business,” Oliverio said.
The suggested ordinance also includes requirements for rental agreements, interior display of the permit and interior display of a 24 hour contact number for a person responsible for the property. Occupancy limits must also be posted.
The rental agreement must include parking capacity, trash disposal regulations, and other information so tenants are informed of the ordinances.
Once registration is complete, police and code enforcement officers will be able to track the number of nuisance complaints a specific property or property owner has received – even if those complaints were regarding one of their tenants.
Tenants will receive violations when complaints are confirmed by the reporting code enforcement officer or police officer and property owners are to be informed as soon as possible. Owners or their designated representative must be available 24-hours per day every day and be within close proximity to the property. A property owner will receive a violation if their representative does not respond within two hours of a complaint. Fines will be given to the owner for every two complaints made within 24 months that have been responded to in an untimely manner or not at all. The fines as suggested by the committee will begin at $250 and go up to $1,000 for each additional violation within two years.
The fourth violation will go before the Marco Island Code Enforcement Board and may include suspension of the short term rental permit.
Any person failing to abate nuisance activities after designation as a chronic nuisance premises by the Code Enforcement Board shall be subject to a forfeiture of not less than $1,000 nor more than $5,000 for failure to abate the nuisance activity.
Nuisances will be defined similarly to the current nuisance ordinance which is relevant to all residents. Some of these nuisance violations were repeated in the short-term rental draft ordinance for clarity including those that committee members said were the most pertinent to these property types. These are parking on driveways, not lawns and not blocking sidewalks; trash receptacles outside only between 6 p.m. the day before trash day until 7 p.m. the day of trash day, and noise.
Short term rental properties will be allowed a less restrictive rule on occupancy.
Committee member Karen Salvi disagreed with the leniency. The current ordinance includes restricting most residences to only four non-related, non-family members per dwelling. The ordinance for short-term rental properties will allow two people per bedroom plus two more people.
“That’s what saved us from spring breakers. I would never go for that,” Salvi said.
Salvi eventually gave-in and approved the draft ordinance, which passed unanimously Wednesday night. The ordinance for short term rental properties will allow two people per bedroom plus two more people.

Comments
This site does not necessarily agree with comments posted below — responsibility lies with the relevant reader alone. Read our privacy policy & user agreement.
So now we know why this committee had so many realators on it. Absentee landlords living 1,000 miles away will be held responsible and not the agent that manages and rents the property? The Chamber has protected it's own.
Posted by Fossil on May 9, 2008 at 6:36 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Excellent...and who said this wouldn't happen?
Something will be put in place, if not what is entirely outlined in the article...something is better than nothing at all.
Posted by MMarco on May 9, 2008 at 7:03 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Literally nothing has happened yet. The self serving Rental Committee has come up with a recommendation/ ordinance. I still do not see why registration is required and what it accomplishes other than creating more beaurocracy. Just pass an ordinance fining the Landlords for repeated noise offenders or trash offenders and the Landlords will put this into the Rental Agreements holding the offenders responsible. Then empower the Police to respond to noise problems.
Ed Issler
Posted by lauralbi1 on May 9, 2008 at 8:56 a.m. (Suggest removal)
lauralbi1 is registration not a requirement of Collier County Government? Is it not the purpose of resgistration to control small business and ensure appropriate taxes are paid on the monies earned from that business? I wonder how many of these small business operations are actually reporting their earnings to the federal govenment? I'm sure those who have management contracts do report their earnings, but how about those who self manage? You want to know why registration was necessary, well the foregoing is one reason.
Posted by Fossil on May 9, 2008 at 11:42 a.m. (Suggest removal)
The realtors and rental management companies are being protected. Why? Lets follow this to the ultimate end. To protect the owner from being fined there is NOTHING THEY CAN DO.
THE ONLY THING THEY CAN DO IS ...
The owner, who will be fined, will now have to complete due diligence to check on the renter prior to renting to them?
The City is placing the duty on a person that is not in the day to day business of rental.
The owner of real estate will need to know the persons name, address and run credit reports to check on the background of the renter?
WHAT DOES THE CITY WANT THE OWNER TO DO? THEY ONLY WANT TO BE ABLE TO FINE SOMEONE/THE OWNER.
SOMEONE TELL ME .. What can the owner do in advance to protect themselves? If you can't then this law is not reasonable.
Posted by marcoredeagle on May 9, 2008 at 12:36 p.m. (Suggest removal)
This is a private property issue. Enforce or bolster the noise and nuisance ordinances. Charging me then dictating when were who and how long I can rent my property for is.....like the condo association from hell. STOP ALREADY when this all passes it will be a sad day for Marco's future property owners. Shame on all you realtors participating in this.
Posted by sunnycity on May 9, 2008 at 2:25 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Marcoredeagle asks what the owner can do in advance to protect themselves. And Fossill asks how we, Marco, can get into people's personal portfolios to make certain your neighbor is paying their taxes. Marcoredeagle, a landlord can incorporate (pass on) any penalty or fine into the rental agreement and enforce it from the Security Deposit. What could be simpler. You tell/show in the agreement a prosepective renter that if they make too much noise after hours or do not take care of the exterior that the landlord will be fined and they, in turn, will have that amount deducted from their deposit. But it does NOT take a beaurocratic registration program to enforce that. I guess it was too simple for the Committee. And Fossill, who cares about a Collier Ordinance. There are a lot of Collier Ordinances that are no longer applicable since Marco became a City. Rentals pay Sales Tax and it is none of your business what a Landlord does with his Tax Return. And Registration will do nothing to change that anyway.
Ed Issler
Posted by lauralbi1 on May 9, 2008 at 3:21 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I am sure that you all realize why this ordinance is being passed... the City of Marco wants another revenue source.
I am certain there will be a fee to "register" your property; and the fines will be abundant and expensive. Let's not forget to mention the eventual "habitual offenders" fine that will surely be added to some homeowners.
Get real. This isn't about appeasing neighbors, it's about getting more money into the City.
Posted by Rachael on May 10, 2008 at 2:27 p.m. (Suggest removal)
how bad is this situation REALLY? I've rented for 15 years. I wouldn't dream of being a nuisance. I don't recall seeing too many "spring break" types around. What are these terrible short-term renters doing?
Posted by westernny on May 12, 2008 at 9:06 p.m. (Suggest removal)
paranoid 'nothing else to do' people.
get a life.
and leave us alone.
Posted by gernblanstone on May 15, 2008 at 10:08 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Post your comment
(Requires free registration.)