STORY TOOLS

• E-mail story
• Comments
• iPod friendly
• Printer friendly

RELATED STORIES

• Long voyage for Marco yacht club proposal

More Fishing and Boating

• Farmworkers’ children get chance to tackle new skill -- fishing
• Seaworthy: Don’t be color blind when fixing your boat
• Angler's Outlook: Near and offshore adventures

Share and Enjoy [?]

Supersized. That was the charge Marco Island Planning Board Chair James Riviere leveled against the Marco Island Yacht Club’s proposed docks at Friday’s meeting.

But he had the same thing to say about city staff concerns surrounding the proposal, which failed 3-2 after a morning of conversation and deliberation. Boardmembers David Caruso and Bill Patterson were absent.

The proposal went before the planning board for a second time seeking a variance to allow two docks to extend into the Marco River past the 20-foot maximum, one at 390 feet and the other at 333 feet. The new facilities would add 40 boat slips for use by the Marco Island Yacht Club and the Marco Island Marina Association.

Since it was presented to the planning board Aug. 10, the proposal was adjusted to shift the two docks to the southeast, 20 to 25 feet away from the mouth of the Chestnut Waterway. However, the changes did not address one of the largest concerns voiced by the planning board and city staff in August: that the docks are just too big.

Rather, yacht club Vice Chair Rudi Landwaard and engineer Joe Cunningham chose to focus on the reasons that the docks would not be too cumbersome, presenting the board with boat traffic models and simulations of how much nearby residents’ views would be affected.

In the end, the deciding factor once again was the length of the docks.

“I wasn’t inclined until today to support this,” boardmember Vincent Magee said. “But I’m still going to stick with the staff recommendation. If you could bring this down just a little bit, I could get behind it.”

City planner Bryan Milk advised the board that the docks might put too much strain on the area’s manatee population, and that the facilities would be too imposing a presence on both the Marco River and the Chestnut Waterway.

However, staff did not state to what extent the project should be scaled back, though Magee requested direction on how much is too much.

Fellow boardmember Monte Lazarus, who voted in favor of approving the variance, said the concerns about size were not based in logic or science, but on gut feelings.

Magee suggested that shaving 30 or 40 feet off the longer of the two docks would be enough to satisfy his concerns.

In an interview after the meeting, Landwaard said he is not sure yet whether the plan can be reduced that much and still meet the yacht club’s goals.

“I did studies on this, and in the first seven years it will not make money for the club,” Landwaard said. “If you have to cut it back more, it’s gonna take even longer.”

The proposal is slated to go before the planning board again Oct. 5.