Home › Island News › Local News
New sewer funding proposal would increase taxes
STORY TOOLS
Tell us about it
- What would you add to this story? Tell us what we missed.
- Do you have photos from this event? Documents we need to see? Share with us.
- Upload photos & videos
- More ways to get your stuff online and in the paper.
More Local News
- Eagle to charge at newsstands
- Marco Island Police Briefs: Nov. 21, 2008
- We are family: Marco community to have Thanksgiving feast together
Share and Enjoy [?]
While it would put a $10,000 cap on property owners' prepaid sewer assessments, a new proposal for funding the $105 million Septic Tank Replacement Program (STRP) would increase property taxes for all property owners on Marco Island.
The newest plan is being proposed by Marco Island City Council Chairwoman Terri DiSciullo and would require a public referendum held as early as June.
Highlights of the financing scheme include having all island property owners pay for the sewer line construction, putting a cap of $10,000 on every property owner's prepaid sewer assessment, and doing away with rate increases in utility bills paid by every utility customer.
The property owners could make equal payments of about $930 each year over a 20-year period. Another payment option would be to defer the payments for 20 years or when the property is sold to another person.
City Council already approved an 8 percent increase in the utility rates for all utility customers, while reducing assessments for the STRP by an average of $1,500 for new sewer hook-ups. That would pay for the resurfacing of streets in each district after the neighborhoods are sewered.
The council also agreed to increase monthly utility bills for all property owners another 8 percent to pay for a proposal to reduce the assessments by about $2,500 that would offset the cost of upgrading the wastewater treatment plant to membrane technology.
DiSciullo said that if voters approved a referendum by mail ballot, the city could issue general obligation bonds to fund the balance of the STRP.
She noted that the sewer project will continue as a special assessment program.
"The referendum will only determine whether voters are willing to share in the cost through their annual property tax bill," she stated to the Marco Eagle.
MARCO SEPTIC TANK REPLACEMENT PROGRAM
- POLL: Should residents vote to end the Septic Tank Replacement Program?
- POLL: Should the city council consider a referendum that would cap all sewer assessments at $10,000?
- DOCUMENT: View a financial analysis of the septic tank replacement program prepared by the City of Marco Island (.pdf)
- RELATED: Marco moves to accelerate septic replacement program (06-04-07)
- RELATED: State supreme court ruling backs Marco’s septic replacement project (05-31-07)
- RELATED: State high court to hear arguments today on Marco septic tank program (04-19-07)
- RELATED: Island Update: What’s up with ... the current phase of the STRP (04-19-07)
- RELATED: Septic financing and firefighter salaries on agenda (04-06-07)
- RELATED: Petitions seek to change Marco government, put septic tank replacement program to a referendum (04-04-07)
- RELATED: Contentious issues on Marco council's agenda (03-04-07)
- EXPANDED COVERAGE: Read more stories about the Septic Tank Replacement Program

Comments
This site does not necessarily agree with comments posted below — responsibility lies with the relevant reader alone. Read our privacy policy & user agreement.
Very interesting proposal. For some homesteaded inland homeowners on sewers, it would appear the roll back of proposed rate increases vs. a minimum tax increase would result in a wash. For vacant lot owners and absentee landlords this is bad news. For the more affluent who itemize, the increase is deductable and results in an indirect Federal subsidy if they are to be new users. For all big water users this can be a gift. For those who recently homesteaded this will be a big hit on their pocket books. For investors and second home owners who are not homesteaded this is taxation without representation. Personally, it favors my situation so I would support it.
#1 Posted by bbyrone46 on February 28, 2007 at 7:40 p.m. (Suggest removal)
bbyrone: it is all about you, isn't it?
#2 Posted by patton1 on February 28, 2007 at 11:32 p.m. (Suggest removal)
patton 1, looks to me like bbyrone showed you that although some will not benefit many others including him/herself will. Which group do you fall into?
#3 Posted by Lolala on March 1, 2007 at 9:28 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Post your comment
(Requires free registration.)