Login | Contact Us | Feedback | Site Map | Archives | RSS | Subscribe to the paper

HomeIsland NewsLocal News

Guest commentary: A recap of the asbestos issue to date

STORY TOOLS
Share on Facebook

EDITOR’S NOTE: Today’s guest commentary is provided by City Manager Bill Moss.

It should be obvious to all that many citizens are migrating back to Marco Island – where spectacular sunsets, pristine waterways and beaches and magnificent shore birds all help make Marco Island our Paradise. Our retailers, restaurants, home maintenance, Realtors, hotels and rentals, and others in our service industry are ready to make our lives more enjoyable.

In addition, the city staff is ready to serve you.

There have been so many positive accomplishments recently. Fortunately, most businesses have had a very good off-season and we have been blessed with an absence of “windy” weather. On behalf of the Marco Island City Council, “Welcome back, we missed you!”

Your city government continues to replace and improve the city’s infrastructure that is so important to our lifestyles and property values.

One important lesson that has been learned is to avoid construction of roads during peak season whenever possible. All applaud the results of the South Collier Boulevard construction, but achieving those results was difficult for many, especially during late 2005 when a Category 3 hurricane passed through.

Learning from past lessons, the North Collier Boulevard construction work will cease by the end of December, except for the planting of new landscaping within the medians and rights-of-way.

Like many communities, Marco Island has its share of problems and controversies. One such issue is the recent discovery of additional asbestos concrete (a/c) pipe fragments at an area known as “Site C” at the Veterans Community Park.

Last week the City Manager’s office, news media, and a few citizens provided information regarding the discovery of additional pieces of a/c pipe at the Veterans Community Park, Site C. The purpose of this message is to offer information about the findings, the city’s actions with regard to its removal, and to assure residents that there are no known exposure issues related to the a/c pipe fragments at Site C.

Finding a/c fragments is troublesome, but it is not a crisis. Remedial action has been initiated to remove the a/c fragments, and an investigation is under way to determine how they got there.

For background, the Veterans Community Park, formerly known as the Glon property, was divided into three sections and used as a construction staging area for the North and South Collier Boulevard Construction Projects. Site C is a section of the property between Elkcam Circle and the canal (same side as Winn-Dixie).

On Oct. 23, 2005, the day before the arrival of Hurricane Wilma, there existed on Site C a large pile of woodchips resulting from the removal of Australian Pines along the seawall. A citizen expressed concern that these large wood pieces could become projectiles during Hurricane Wilma and a City employee agreed.

During the severe weather conditions, the employee asked an employee of Quality Enterprises to move sections of concrete that were stored at another location to stabilize the wood chip pile.

In March of 2006, the presence of asbestos concrete pipe fragments were found on Site C.

While the source has never been determined, it is assumed that the employee inadvertently moved some sections of a/c pipe to the woodchip pile.

An environmental consulting firm, AMRC, was immediately retained to develop a mitigation plan to remove a/c pipe fragments found on Site C. Air monitoring for the presence of asbestos was initiated, and dust samples were taken at various locations surrounding the park area.

A mitigation plan was developed and an asbestos-qualified contractor was hired to completely remove six to 12 inches of soil from the area were fragments were observed. That mitigation effort was completed on March 30, 2006.

Substantial evidence exists that there were no observable a/c fragments. Eighteen test sites were identified and all indicated the absence of asbestos. There are several hundred photographs of the site to help substantiate the belief that a/c removal was complete.

On Oct. 24, 2006, city personnel confirmed the presence of pieces of a/c pipe in a relatively small area of Site C. An asbestos removal contractor was immediately hired to pick up pieces of a/c pipe fragments on the surface. As the contractor removed the pipe fragments, they observed that some fragments were beneath the surface. The presence of remaining fragments beneath the surface then dictated a thorough review of the problem and solution.

While it is too soon to tell, the fragments seem to be confined to a relatively small area, compared to the original cleanup site, and do not appear to be large in quantity.

One can only speculate as to why there are pieces on and below the surface.

Following completion of the mitigation in March, 18 test sites were staked to identify locations to test soil for evidence of asbestos. Some of these stakes remain today, and there are photographs of each site. At one location, two fragments of a/c pipe were found last week on the surface next to a test-site stake, while the photograph of that area revealed no pipe fragments.

Information changes daily. There appears to be evidence that dumping of some sort did occur at this location after the site cleanup.

Whether that dumping contained a/c pipe fragments is unknown, but remains suspicious, according to Chief (Roger) Reinke.

The ultimate conclusion cannot be reached at this time. Several theories have been discussed and include: a/c pipe fragments were further below the surface than originally believed; dumping of a/c pipe did occur; pieces were tossed by someone; pipe fragments were on the site long ago and are now being uncovered; photographs and the final inspection of the original cleanup failed to reveal remaining fragments; or any combination of these options.

On Oct. 30, I directed an environmental consultant (AMRC) to develop a strategy to remove remaining pieces of a/c pipe. Concurrently, the Marco Island Police Department continues its investigation.

AMRC, the city’s independent environmental consultant with expertise in asbestos issues, is tasked to develop an independent analysis and recommendation. As in the past, they will develop recommendations and a course of action that they believe are appropriate.

Within six working days, AMRC will explore the area that likely contains remnants of a/c pipe fragments. While it is believed to be a relatively small area and small quantity, this cannot be confirmed until further tests and analysis are conducted.

When quantified, AMRC will provide a recommendation for remediation. This will likely involve the removal of additional soil within the area of concern.

AMRC has conducted air sampling on average of once a month since last March. Additionally, air samples were taken last week. At no time have samples indicated risks for asbestos exposure. AMRC will continue to monitor air samples at least until the mitigation effort is complete.

There are some who are communicating concerns of contamination and a serious health hazard with “island-wide asbestos pollution.” There is no evidence to support these contentions.

Asbestos is made up of microscopic bundles of fibers that may become airborne when a/c material is damaged or disturbed. The existence of a/c pipe, used for water and sewer lines in the early stages of Marco Island’s development, is known by all.

While pipe fragments may be harmful if in a “friable” condition, that is when crushed or pulverized so that asbestos is released into the atmosphere, fragments lying on the surface or beneath the surface are not, in and of themselves, a health risk.

The City of Marco Island is committed to resolving this issue. We need your help. Please share this information with your friends, neighbors, families and associates. Correct information about this can help calm fears or assumptions that are spreading around the island.

Next, when you hear information different from this, please contact us. We will be happy to help obtain the answers you seek.

Your city’s staff is here to serve, so allow us the opportunity. Soon you will see enhancements to the city’s communications abilities, a new Web site, facts vs. myths, questions of the month and e-mail fact sheets, to name a few. All of these are focused on serving our citizens better.

We are a community that is moving forward. We hope that you continue to enjoy your Marco Island Paradise.

Comments

This site does not necessarily agree with comments posted below — responsibility lies with the relevant reader alone. Read our privacy policy & user agreement.


and the spin continues....what about the asbestos dumping we don't know about or haven't discovered?
and we all knew there was no way to finish collier by december as bill and rony stated last year...so now besides the streets torn up, the asbestos, the winterberry bridge debacle,the new "jail", the recall, celebrate marco and the sewers we have the dredge at caxambas for the next two months....can't anything be completed during the summer? if bill and the city council had their way we would all leave and come back in 5 years and buy a condo.

#1 Posted by van on November 2, 2006 at 8:52 a.m. (Suggest removal)

To imply that the asbestos is benign in it's present enviroment is to be ignorent it's potential. The asbestos fragments on the site are constantly at risk of going from benign to friable. A worker walking on the site can break a piece, if he then steps on it, he will likely crush it. If he is raking the area to find fragments he can break a piece. If a Shovel strikes a fragment it will break it open, if a truck or piece of heavy equipment drives over the area crushing will become commonplace. To belittle the danger is to ignore the consequences. When is the contaminated area going to be fenced in and warning signs placed. Our citizens deserve better than this.

#2 Posted by bbyrone46 on November 2, 2006 at 9:33 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Perhaps someone active against the progress of the city planted the pipes...this is not the first time that officials have said the pipes appearance looked suspicious and I believe the chief to be a credible man.

Moss did a nice job of laying out the facts he has and I look forward to more "no spin" and factual commentary.

#3 Posted by captnjimbo on November 2, 2006 at 12:02 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Maybe pigs fly too. Lets see here, Moss says if you hear anything different then what I'm telling you, check it out with the City that brought you this problem. Ask those responsible for covering up their incompetance and those responsible for the problem in the first place. The people that can't find a solution to this problem are the last people I would turn to. Trust but verify, right?

#4 Posted by bbyrone46 on November 2, 2006 at 12:11 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Captnjimbo,

I have said many times that you are a reasonable man, but think about this "planting" idea a little. How could they bring in SO MUCH and BURY it six to twelve inches beneath the surface? Come on now, let's be reasonable. In addition, the risk of being caught (remember to consider how large an effort this would be, the size of the equipment necessary AND the amount of time that it would take) would be great. The potential financial penalty humongous. NO ONE would attempt this.

More undeniably, the city doesn't NEED any help from us "malcontents". They are perfectly capable to screwing it up all by themselves....not once, but repeatedly.

JWP

#5 Posted by jwputnam on November 2, 2006 at 12:52 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Everyone keeps forgetting that our police force must have buried the stuff. Detective Linda Guerrero unearthed it using a stick and brought some to the surface. How did she know it was there unless she buried it?
Talk about ridiculous. No one planted this stuff, it was never cleaned up to start with. To try to throw blame CARES or the Recall Committee is just as ridiculous as blaming our Detective (who is a class act by the way).

Bob Brown

#6 Posted by rcbauburn on November 2, 2006 at 8:44 p.m. (Suggest removal)

I think the burrowing owls planted it. ONLY KIDDING.(next we'll have Moss and Tucker out there investigating these birds)

#7 Posted by valnmario on November 3, 2006 at 9:30 a.m. (Suggest removal)

I assume that all who have commented have read all the depositions from the lawsuit (which the City won) and have gone to City Hall and reviewed the 300 pictures of Site C that exist (taken after the first clean up). In addition, while you are there, you might also review the monitoring information that was compiled for the last 12 months taken from around the Site A and Site C area.
I think we are all ready to have Site A and Site C cleaned up and looking somewhat like they did before all of this mess. That should be all of our goals. After all, the most contamination that has occurred on Site C was when Mr. Beaufort broke a piece of the concrete pipe.
Anyway, I see a calming in all the responses, as it should be. Let us look forward to walking on grass on Site C shortly.

#8 Posted by lauralbi1 on November 12, 2006 at 10:21 p.m. (Suggest removal)



Post your comment
(Requires free registration.)

Username:

Password:
(Forgotten your password?)

Your Turn: